Income inequality is increasingly "permanent"

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Reuters
By:  Ryan McCarthy
March 21, 2013

We've heard about rising income inequality for years -- it's become a post-recession rallying cry. Even Jamie Dimon seems to think inequality is bad.  

The hope, however, was that this was a cyclical problem -- when the economy got cranking again, those of us hit hard by the downturn would start earning more and income inequality would fall.  

A new paper, however, looking at male and household earnings, finds that income inequality is increasingly permanent. (The study didn't break out women's income.) "Rising Inequality: Transitory or Permanent?," which was submitted as part of the Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, looks at pre- and after-tax incomes from 1987 to 2009 and finds some disturbing trends.

The study's authors find that the effects of this variance are increasingly lasting. They differentiate between "transitory inequality" and "permanent inequality." The former might come from getting laid off in a bad economy or from people moving up the economic ladder by pulling in higher salaries. Permanent inequality, the authors find, is the key driver of the growth in income inequality for men.  Worse, "for household income, both before and after taxes, the increase in inequality over this period was predominantly, although not entirely, permanent," the study's authors find.

What does this mean? It could lend credence to the idea that American men simply don't have the skills that economy needs right now. "Our data would imply stories such as skill-biased technical change or globalization that has increased the inequality of lifetime incomes," one of the study's authors told the FT.  

It could also mean that a key component of the way we think about the U.S. economy could be broken. We tend to think that America is a pull-yourself-up-by-the-bootstraps economy. Lose your job? Just work harder, move or get new skills. This study -- and the 4.8 million Americans who are officially considered among the long-term unemployed -- suggest that it's much harder to get back on our feet economically than we think. As University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers said: "The rich are getting richer and staying richer. The poor are getting poorer and staying poorer."

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Income inequality is increasingly "permanent".

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.cfed.org/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/cfed/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/5185

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by CFED published on March 22, 2013 2:46 PM.

Big banks engaging in payday lending, report says was the previous entry in this blog.

Costly Bank Payday Loans Criticized in Report is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.