Low-performing schools move ahead with replacing staff

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

The Washington Post
By: Nick Anderson
December 10, 2010

Education officials across the country have replaced the principals and at least half of the staff in about 150 struggling schools to obtain federal aid, the Obama administration disclosed Thursday.

In several hundred other cases, principals have been replaced and other major steps taken as part of the administration's unprecedented $3.5 billion campaign to rejuvenate thousands of the nation's lowest-performing schools.

The initiative, which reflects President Obama's get-tough policy on school reform, is likely to be central to the coming debate in Congress over revision of the No Child Left Behind law.

Thursday's report on the school improvement grant program shows that despite protests this year over proposals to fire large numbers of teachers in Central Falls, R.I., and elsewhere, many state and local officials are willing to replace half or more of a school's faculty in an effort to turn it around.

What's more, some of those turnaround attempts are moving ahead without opposition from teachers unions.

On Dec. 1, Dennis Van Roekel, president of the National Education Association, joined Education Secretary Arne Duncan in a tour of G. James Gholson Middle School in Prince George's County.

The Landover school, which has failed to meet academic targets for the past eight years, won a $2.7 million turnaround grant. This fall, it has two new co-principals, and half its staff is new. Three other county middle schools - Benjamin Stoddert, Drew-Freeman and Thurgood Marshall - are on a similar path.

Van Roekel said Thursday that his appearance at Gholson was not meant to endorse a fire-the-faculty strategy. But he said, "I talked to the local [union] there and was impressed with the level of collaboration and parental engagement."

He said the NEA, with 3.2 million members, in general prefers other strategies for fixing schools besides replacing staff. But he added: "We're not going to ignore kids in any school. The success of the students is what we have to focus on."

Many other schools nationwide targeted for major shake-ups are represented by the1.5 million-member American Federation of Teachers.

Duncan said he was pleased at the high level of participation in the school improvement campaign. "The story is that there hasn't been screaming," he said. "There hasn't been outcry. Folks are just doing the hard work together. Folks are taking this work extraordinarily seriously."

Education Department data on the initiative, which is funded by the 2009 economic stimulus law, offer the most detailed look yet at efforts underway to overhaul (and in some cases shut down) at least 730 low-performing schools in 44 states.

The report had no information on schools in the District or in Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana and New Hampshire.

School officials were given four options to obtain funding. They could implement the turnaround model, replacing staff and giving a new principal additional powers. They could shut down a school. They could do what is known as a restart, handing management to an independent operator such as a charter organization. Or they could choose the option known as transformation, which involves replacing the principal (with a few exceptions), overhauling instruction, increasing lesson time and taking other steps to improve academics.

Taken together, those remedies are significantly more intrusive than fixes prescribed in No Child Left Behind, enacted in 2002 under President George W. Bush.

In the program, transformation is the most popular option. Data show officials have made that choice in seven out of every 10 cases. Transformation is the model for school improvement at T.C. Williams High in Alexandria, for example, and at 10 other schools elsewhere in Virginia.

The turnaround model was chosen in 21 percent of cases, including at least 29 schools in California and six in Maryland. Five percent of schools were restarted and 3 percent closed.

Obama raised a furor among educators in March when he expressed support for Rhode Island officials who were moving to replace teachers at Central Falls High School. Subsequently, Rhode Island officials did not carry out plans for the mass firings.

The episode suggested that Obama and Duncan would encounter massive resistance to reforms that entail replacing teachers. But that has not necessarily proven to be the case.

Linda Darling-Hammond, an education professor at Stanford University, said staff replacement has been tried in many places since the 1980s - often without success. Good teachers often don't want to work at a school labeled a failure, she said, adding that strong leadership and a comprehensive improvement plan are essential. "There are ways to reboot a school that can be thoughtful," she said.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Low-performing schools move ahead with replacing staff.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.cfed.org/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/cfed/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2328

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by CFED published on December 10, 2010 4:07 PM.

Banks Try to Understand the Unbanked was the previous entry in this blog.

Your Child Left Behind is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.